SAP C_S4TM_2601 Actual Tests : SAP Certified - SAP S/4HANA Cloud Private Edition, Transportation Management (C_S4TM_2601)

CHALLENGE 4 - Terminal Charges and Delivery-Level Settlement Allocation Carrier road-leg charges calculate correctly, but terminal surcharges are missing when freight orders are manually adjusted after terminal assignment. Finance can still post the settlement document, but the cost explanation is incomplete.
What should the team validate?
Response:

• A. Whether manually adjusted freight orders still carry the terminal attributes required by surcharge conditions and settlement allocation.
• B. Whether event tracking should be completed after settlement to improve cost reporting.
• C. Whether terminal surcharges should be replaced with a single average road surcharge for easier posting.
• D. Whether direct road shipments should be excluded from all future charge calculation tests.

A laboratory equipment distributor uses SAP S/4HANA Transportation Management to plan outbound shipments to hospitals and service depots. Automatic planning reduces freight order count, but shipments requiring installation-team coordination are grouped with standard depot replenishment. The freight orders are executable and use the intended carrier, but installation deliveries arrive outside the scheduled technician window.
Service operations wants installation windows protected, while logistics wants to retain consolidation savings for standard replenishment. The constraint is to keep automatic planning and subcontracting active while preventing installation-dependent deliveries from being delayed by consolidation logic.
Which planning decision best fits the constraint?
Response:

• A. Increase consolidation weighting so the optimizer continues reducing freight order count across hospitals and depots.
• B. Adjust the planning criteria so installation-window requirements restrict consolidation before freight orders are finalized.
• C. Exclude all hospital deliveries from automatic planning so installation coordination can be handled manually.
• D. Keep the planning setup unchanged and ask service operations to reschedule technician windows after transportation planning.

A regional environmental monitoring equipment supplier is adding depot-to-verification-center movements in SAP S/4HANA Transportation Management while customer outbound delivery remains stable. Verification-transfer requirements from two depots should create freight units for the same verification center. During testing, one depot creates transportation demand correctly, but the second depot's transfers are assigned to a retired maintenance-routing structure.
The active transportation network contains the verification center and intended carrier lanes. The rollout team finds that the second depot retained a legacy transportation relationship from a phased migration. The constraint is to correct only the intended verification-transfer flow without changing stable outbound delivery behavior or activating unrelated depot movements.
Which action best resolves the assignment issue?
Response:

• A. Correct the second depot's transportation location and relevance assignment so intended verification transfers bind to the active verification-center lanes.
• B. Activate transportation relevance for all depot movements so every maintenance-related document can be evaluated by planning.
• C. Rebuild outbound delivery lanes so every depot uses one harmonized transportation location relationship.
• D. Manually redirect affected freight units to the verification center until migration data review is complete.

CHALLENGE 2 - Mixed-Load Planning for Depot and Yard Shipments
Two freight orders are created for similar yard shipments. One preserves the oversized vehicle requirement and depot timing, while the manually adjusted one requires logistics coordinators to revise the customer delivery promise.
Which factor should drive the next validation?
Response:

• A. Whether output communication should be skipped until after freight settlement is posted.
• B. Whether freight unit constraints remain connected to freight order grouping and mixed-load timing.
• C. Whether sales can keep a spreadsheet of revised delivery promises for ship repair yards.
• D. Whether both freight orders can later receive any calculated carrier charge.

A third-party electronics distributor is blueprinting SAP S/4HANA Transportation Management for a mixed landscape where one business unit will move first and another will remain on its current shipping process for two quarters. The steering team wants a process design that supports freight order visibility and later charge settlement, but the first rollout must avoid forcing all delivery flows into the new transportation process.
The transportation lead proposes enabling only the lanes and business scenarios needed for the first rollout wave. The operations director prefers a broader design to avoid later redesign. The constraint is to support incremental modernization while keeping the first release executable and controlled.
Which blueprinting decision best fits the stated rollout constraint?
Response:

• A. Define the first rollout around the transportation scenarios, lanes, and integration points that must operate now, while documenting the later expansion path.
• B. Keep transportation planning outside SAP S/4HANA Transportation Management until every business unit can move at the same time.
• C. Prioritize charge settlement design first and postpone freight order visibility until the second rollout wave.
• D. Enable all planned transportation scenarios in the initial design so future business units can adopt the process without additional blueprinting.